<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad and the Flash war</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grafphoto.com/wordpress/2010/03/07/ipad-and-the-flash-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grafphoto.com/wordpress/2010/03/07/ipad-and-the-flash-war/</link>
	<description>Nature photography, art, environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.grafphoto.com/wordpress/2010/03/07/ipad-and-the-flash-war/comment-page-1/#comment-23867</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grafphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1874#comment-23867</guid>
		<description>Jim, sorry for the late reply.  I think some pages are going to be designed for the 900-1000 px range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, sorry for the late reply.  I think some pages are going to be designed for the 900-1000 px range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.grafphoto.com/wordpress/2010/03/07/ipad-and-the-flash-war/comment-page-1/#comment-23835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grafphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1874#comment-23835</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see how fast HTML5 is adopted in the newer browsers. Apple seems to be banking on that as a substitution for Flash (in combination with their own Quicktime codec. 

What pixel dimension are you going to be designing for? 1024px wide? With the iPad being this dimension and the increased size of most monitors now that might a safe bet.

I&#039;m looking forward to seeing the new site. I would not burn too much energy on the Flash transition issues. Be sure to use a noflash script with a browser sniffer and you should be fine. It&#039;s the best solution to cater to Flash and non-Flash devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see how fast HTML5 is adopted in the newer browsers. Apple seems to be banking on that as a substitution for Flash (in combination with their own Quicktime codec. </p>
<p>What pixel dimension are you going to be designing for? 1024px wide? With the iPad being this dimension and the increased size of most monitors now that might a safe bet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing the new site. I would not burn too much energy on the Flash transition issues. Be sure to use a noflash script with a browser sniffer and you should be fine. It&#8217;s the best solution to cater to Flash and non-Flash devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash Wars and Ipad &#187; The Photo Nomads</title>
		<link>http://www.grafphoto.com/wordpress/2010/03/07/ipad-and-the-flash-war/comment-page-1/#comment-23708</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash Wars and Ipad &#187; The Photo Nomads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grafphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1874#comment-23708</guid>
		<description>[...] War&#8217; between Apple and Adobe seems to be continuing. No Flash support for the Ipad. Here&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] War&#8217; between Apple and Adobe seems to be continuing. No Flash support for the Ipad. Here&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

