Notes from the Woods

seeing · environment · exploration · photography

Mute swan and cygnets

mute swan and chicks

mute swan and chicks BI9739-2

Written by Mark

Born and raised in Detroit, c. 323 ppm CO2, Mark Graf is a Michigan photographer, naturalist, and diver whose muse is summoned by exploring the endless connections in nature; land, sea, and sky.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Mute swan w/ cygnets at nest in rain

Mute swan with cygnets at nest in pouring rain | D800, 200-400 f4, ISO 3200

I have been itching for some more practice with wildlife and my D800.   Since I don’t have the Nikon expensive vertical grip, my frame rate is limited to 4 fps (frames per second) in FX mode, and the camera can do 5 fps in DX mode.   The vertical grip would give me up to 6 fps.  With moving wildlife, I know one frame can mean the difference between a keeper and a throwaway, but I have been hesitant to add bulk and expense with the extra grip without getting some more trials in with the native speeds.

I went back to one of my old favorite spots a couple of times over the past few days, Kensington Metropark near Milford, Michigan.    This place always seems to have something to offer up, especially in spring time where herons are nesting, swans, sandhill cranes, turtles (not a good test of frame rate 🙂 ), and generally very acclimated wildlife to people.   It is the go-to spot for area nature photographers.   I used to spend a lot more time there, but have taken up exploring other spots over the past few years.   I was reminded that Kensington remains pretty special when it comes to wildlife encounters.

The first day was quite overcast, meaning I had to use high ISOs to get any type of decent shutter speed to stop motion.   A mute swan had made a nest just a short distance from the main boardwalk there, providing for very comfortable access shooting platform.  I spent a good part of the morning testing out various crop modes of the D800 so that I have a decent feel for it now.   Going to DX mode definitely helps, and a majority of the time it is eliminating unnecessary pixels anyway.  So I will take the extra frame per second when needed.

As you can see in the picture above, I was caught in some significant rain.   It has been awhile since I have photographed in rain, and I ended up liking the different type of image it offered.   The swans didn’t seem to mind it at all, and I like that portrayal of a less than ideal environment.   The image also held up well at ISO 3200.

mute swan and cygnets

Mute swan and cygnets on Wildwing Lake, Milford, MI

I returned back again a couple of days later to entirely different conditions.   Clear skies, and morning sunshine.   I was happy to see all 5 cygnets still around as they are known to succumb to the snapping turtle population in the lake.   I was able to get higher shutter speeds and practice some flight photography also.

All in all, not a bad couple days at one of my old stomping grounds, and a bit more experience under my belt with the wildlife capabilities on the D800.   As for right now, 5 frames per second I think will be just fine.

graf nature photo divider

this post is tagged with these subjects, you are invited to explore and wander …

Passerines | Perching Birds | Songbirds

Passerines | Perching Birds | Songbirds

A task that fell off my radar long ago was to create a bird photography gallery for various backyard, songbirds, grassland birds, blackbirds, etc, that didn't quite fit into the other segmented categories I had. But I didn't know what to call this new gallery because...

read more
Friend or Foe Doe

Friend or Foe Doe

While mining what seems to be a never-ending archive of photos, I stumbled on this photograph of a deer from a park about 30 minutes north of me. And while keywording the image in Lightroom, filling in other metadata, and then doing some slight finishing development...

read more
Following a yellow celebrity

Following a yellow celebrity

My collection of warbler photographs is not very large, not very large at all. Sometimes I wish I spent more time on them, then again that pretty much applies to a lot of different subjects. That combined with the fact that warbler photography is, at least for me,...

read more

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Thank you for spending a little bit of your day here. I truly appreciate it! Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

Topics

I truly appreciate your comments and feedback!.   If you are commenting for the first time – welcome!  Your comment will be held in moderation until I approve it.  This is a courtesy effort to prevent any spam from going out to post subscribers.  No worries, once approved, it’s a one-time-only process.  You are then part of the cool folks who leave thoughtful comments on blogs.  🙂

9 Comments

  1. Paul Grecian

    Hey Mark, I’m curious if you have found the 200-400mm weak at longer distances and what these distances may be. Also, have you been happy with teleconverters attached? Thanks.

    • Mark

      Hi Paul – well, with my 1.7x converter, I am not too happy at all with it on the 200-400 – which is why I when I back for round 2 on this particular trip, I brought my 500. With the 1.4x it is just fine.

      By weak do you mean soft? I noticed that a little at 400, but I think that was when I had my 1.7x on it. I can’t recall having an issue any other times as I am mostly using it at 400mm.

  2. David Leland Hyde (@PhilipHydePhoto)

    It’s the snapping turtles and the Snapping Turtle Turks (the Beatles) you have to watch out for, well sometimes for some people. Anyway, you seem to have stopped action very well in these two images. The second being my favorite from an “artistic” standpoint, but the first having more naturalist’s interest.

  3. Monte Stevens

    I like both images but the wonderful light on the second helps make it pop more. The rain and overcast skies made for a moody feel in the first image and reflects how wildlife needs to adjust to natures conditions. Glad you enjoyed yourself and learned the lessons required for the D800.

    Oh, and it does take a good photographer to capture those speeding turtles. 🙂

    • Mark

      True Monte, you can’t beat great light! 🙂 Thanks for your comments. I will have my eye out for those turtles.

  4. Alan Jones

    Love the shot of the swans in clear water. I got several shots last Tuesday and Wednesday but never in open water. What were your settings for this shot? Although I agree that DX mode has advantages, particularly with your 200-400mm lens, I found that with my 500mm lens the FX mode worked better because at times I was too close (eg when she flapped her wings or when both parents and cygents were all present). Like you I am learning to adjust 4-5 fps vs 12 fpx with my D300s. Thanks for posting your images and commenting on your D800.

    • Mark

      Thanks Alan. Actually the water shot was with my 500. When I went back the second time I brought both and used the 500 mostly. The water shot was 1/4000 sec @ f11 ISO 800 in FX mode. I found myself shooting at f11 / f13 quite a bit because the chicks were rarely parallel with the plane of mom, and I certainly had enough light on the clearer day.

      • Alan Jones

        Thanks Mark. I was at Kensington this morning – only three cygnets remain.

        • Mark

          Aw, that sucks! I guess nature doesn’t discriminate on cute things.