I came across a rather interesting article / blog post here on some cognitive studies done on how artists vs. ‘non-artists’ view images. Click the link and give it a read, and come back because I think this is worthy of some analysis when it comes to photographers and the various ways we approach our subject matter in the field. If we are consciously aware of such things going on in our heads, is it possible to influence our ‘seeing’ ability when we are out in the field? We may be so focused on a subject where particular details in the surroundings could lead to distractions in our images. I think a left vs. right brain, or artist vs. ‘non-artist’ struggle can be going on inside anyone’s head for any particular image they are working on.

I think it is safe to say there exists a very wide range of styles and approaches when it comes to photography, even if limiting it down to nature in particular. The reasons for the variation are probably just as varied! In the context of this particular study, it seems worthwhile to consider the two different types of hats we may be wearing at the moment, the emphasis of each, and the ultimate result on our photographs. I think this may have a lot to do with how many of us need to get ‘into the groove’ when out in the field before we think we can produce anything worthwhile. Perhaps when we first get to a spot, we are thinking more like the psychologist, but as we relax and become more comfortable, we allow the artist side to take over.

I am going to head out into my woods now and contemplate this even further..